🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he has concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence comparable discussions in other member states