🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – developing domestic artificial intelligence models. From Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, states are vying to develop AI that understands native tongues and cultural specifics.

The Global AI Battle

This movement is a component of a wider international competition spearheaded by major corporations from the America and China. Whereas firms like a leading AI firm and Meta allocate massive funds, mid-sized nations are likewise making their own investments in the AI field.

However given such huge sums involved, is it possible for smaller countries attain meaningful benefits? As stated by a specialist from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a wealthy state or a big firm, it’s quite a hardship to build an LLM from scratch.”

Security Issues

Numerous states are reluctant to depend on foreign AI systems. Across India, for instance, US-built AI solutions have occasionally proven inadequate. One example involved an AI agent deployed to teach learners in a remote village – it communicated in the English language with a pronounced US accent that was difficult to follow for regional listeners.

Furthermore there’s the defence dimension. In the Indian security agencies, relying on certain international models is considered not permissible. As one entrepreneur explained, “It could have some unvetted learning material that could claim that, such as, a certain region is outside of India … Using that specific system in a security environment is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve consulted experts who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they are reluctant to rely on American platforms because data might go outside the country, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Efforts

In response, a number of states are funding national ventures. One this initiative is in progress in India, where an organization is striving to build a national LLM with public funding. This project has dedicated approximately $1.25bn to artificial intelligence advancement.

The developer imagines a model that is significantly smaller than leading systems from Western and Eastern tech companies. He states that the country will have to offset the resource shortfall with talent. “Being in India, we lack the advantage of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with say the hundreds of billions that the United States is pumping in? I think that is where the core expertise and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Regional Focus

In Singapore, a public project is funding AI systems educated in local local dialects. These languages – for example Malay, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, Khmer and others – are frequently inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

It is my desire that the people who are building these national AI systems were conscious of the extent to which and the speed at which the cutting edge is progressing.

A leader participating in the initiative explains that these systems are created to enhance larger AI, rather than substituting them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, frequently have difficulty with native tongues and local customs – interacting in stilted Khmer, for instance, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malaysian individuals.

Developing local-language LLMs allows local governments to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful tool developed overseas.

He further explains, I am cautious with the term independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we wish to be more adequately included and we wish to understand the capabilities” of AI platforms.

Cross-Border Partnership

For states seeking to establish a position in an intensifying international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Researchers affiliated with a well-known policy school put forward a public AI company shared among a group of emerging states.

They term the project “Airbus for AI”, modeled after the European effective initiative to create a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would entail the establishment of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the resources of various countries’ AI programs – such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a strong competitor to the US and Chinese leaders.

The lead author of a study setting out the initiative says that the concept has drawn the consideration of AI leaders of at least several states so far, along with a number of sovereign AI organizations. While it is presently focused on “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda included – have likewise expressed interest.

He comments, Currently, I think it’s simply reality there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the present American government. Experts are questioning such as, can I still depend on any of this tech? In case they opt to